News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 'Inland port' could get us out of a jam 

'Inland port' could get us out of a jam

09 Mar, 2010 10:51 AM
A $750M ILLION 'inland port' at Lyndhurst has been touted as a key to unlocking congestion caused by thousands of trucks each day on Monash Freeway and other main arterial roads.

Developer Salta Properties is proposing to build a railway freight terminal that would allow trains to replace freight trucks delivering containers from the Port of Melbourne to the south-eastern suburbs.

The 187-hectare site for the mooted project is in paddocks bounded by Taylors, Glasscocks and Bayliss roads, next to the former Lyndhurst railway station.

The plan has been backed by industry leaders seeking alternatives to the 1000-plus freight vehicles clogging regional main roads.

In a submission to the State Government late last year, Kingston manufacturers cited road congestion and inefficiencies at the Port of Melbourne as major obstacles to growth. The plan, however, has not yet been submitted to Greater Dandenong Council.

On its website, Salta claims the plan would significantly reduce traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.

South East Melbourne Manufacturers Alliance executive officer Paul Dowling said the inland port was needed in conjunction with an upgrade to the Port of Hastings to "get semis off the road".

The combination of the two would ease congestion on roads such as the Monash Freeway, caused by freight trucks heading to Melbourne's south-east from the Port of Melbourne, he said.

"It's critical for us to get the semis off the road to improve efficiency and liveability."

Greater Dandenong Council chief executive John Bennie said the "very exciting" proposal was a "job creator" and would reinforce the municipality's manufacturing role.

"We understand it's contingent on a third or fourth railway line to that site."

Triplication of the Dandenong line was State Government policy in 2006 but was omitted from the 2008 Victorian Transport Plan.

Professor Graham Currie of Monash University's Institute of Transport Studies said:

"It would need more than just duplicating the line.

"Even if they did that, the trains are overcrowded, about 30per cent beyond their [passenger] capacity, at peak times." He also doubted if the project would be economically viable, since trucks had the advantage over trains of being able to deliver from the port to any door in Melbourne.

"Railways are efficient at bulk handling of grains and commodities. You'll find with most whitegoods or perishables that you've got to get it quicker to producers.

"With perishables, it's not something you can have hanging around for days and days in a railway yard."

Professor Currie agreed with the need to reduce freight truck numbers, set to double in number in the next 10-15 years.

The RACV's traffic and roads chief engineer Peter Daly said a better rail network and linking the Western Ring Road and Eastern Freeway were needed to improve freight flows.

"We do know freight growth is going to happen. Naturally, demand for goods by road and rail will increase.

"If the Port of Hastings were to become a major port, that would present significant transport challenges by road and rail."

Salta executive chairman Sam Tarascio did not return calls.

With Mike Morris

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I was very impressed with your artical "Inland Ports". I have been advocating this for over 20 years. I am a retired train driver and was stationed at Dandenong in the 1980s. Up until the mid-80s, Dandenong and Westall were thriving freight rail yards and serviced most heavey industries in the Eastern Suburbs. If a freight depot was established at Lyndhurst and it was serviced by short fast containor trains ( no more than 500 ton loads ) from Dynon yard, there would be no reason for duplication of the railway between Melbourne and Dandenong. These freight trains could run between suburban trains, like the coal trains used to do. While I acknowledge there would still be a need for perishable goods to be transported by road, most general goods movements between Melbourne and the Eastern & South Eastern suburbs could easily be carried by these trains and trucks could then take the containors to their destination. At the same time, it would be a good idea to finally build the proposed railway between Lyndhurst and Frankston for both comuter trains and containor trains from the port at Hastings. This railway was proposed in the 1960s when the steel works and the refinery opened.
Posted by john, 12/03/2010 4:49:16 PM, on Frankston Weekly
The twin-tracked Dandenong line is already congested - putting all these freight trains onto it is going to make things worse for commuters and Vline services. Any proposal like this needs to also cost the triplication of the line to Dandenong or beyond, which currently stops at Caulfield.
Posted by Tony, 16/03/2010 9:17:01 AM, on Frankston Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Heavy crush: Trucks crowd the Monash Freeway.  Picture: Michael Clayton-Jones/The Age
Heavy crush: Trucks crowd the Monash Freeway. Picture: Michael Clayton-Jones/The Age

Most popular articles




Frankston Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...